in my behavioral econ classes, game theory was presented as a universal model for understanding human behavior in social/political contexts now i’m wondering if it’s more like a historical description of how a specific type of strategic mind worked in the mid 20th century
-
-
Getting over Dunbar's number doesn't require the atomization we see today, but it does require strangers to routinely interact, and that's what game theory describes.
-
thanks, that’s a good clarification. i’m curious how game theory would describe interactions between strangers in a more homogenous, communitarian society — i.e. situations where the baseline level of trust is much higher than 0
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
