in my behavioral econ classes, game theory was presented as a universal model for understanding human behavior in social/political contexts now i’m wondering if it’s more like a historical description of how a specific type of strategic mind worked in the mid 20th century
-
-
To clarify: "has to be the case" is not strictly true, but without this the system wouldn't be flexible and therefore sustainable. This is why we used to live at tribal scale for so long, and this is why hippy communes disintegrate at a certain size.
-
Getting over Dunbar's number doesn't require the atomization we see today, but it does require strangers to routinely interact, and that's what game theory describes.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
