Neat! So your clever idea is to remove regulations that protect lives, property, and prosperity so that the individual bears the exorbitant financial burden if something goes wrong because the municipality didn't adequately prepare for disaster?
When the federal government adds to a business or local government’s regulatory burden, it should consider the costs. #UMITA forces regulators to justify their costly regulations. Learn how my bill would impact #NC05 ↓http://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399274 …
-
-
-
As a consumer, I'm MORE likely to buy, for example, in a development that meets strict regulatory standards. I have the peace of mind to know that I'm much less likely to face catastrophic damage to health or property because the builder cut corners.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.