Which happens to be QM. The next step would be matching concepts from the theory to human concepts, the extent to which that works is debatable.
-
-
I can be sold on QFT. QM is statistics as axioms and that's a harder sell.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
I don’t see any difference in the concepts involved. It’s just where you start classically: Point particle mechanics -> (traditional, single particle) QM Field theory -> QFT
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Then maybe we can argue about points. I think everything goes off the rails when we assume there are such places where we divide by zero.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Fair enough, but the weirdness of QM that is not due to point particles completely transfers to QFT
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Quantum means discrete instead of continuous and I'm curious to know more sources from which that constraint can stem.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
The most common way is the quantum harmonic oscillator, and I have no intuitive explanation for it
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Let me try to bridge the gap - I've seen this start with an infinite well, and you have to start with a single central up and down between the two adjacent walls
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Are you describing the first excited mode? That’s not what I mean by unintuitive, it’s that why would it be discrete to begin with
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
I never took calc 2 or 3, I'm an engineer catching up. The infinite well as a source of discrete is something I kind of tangentially grasped was important.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
Yup, exactly. The infinite potential well is easily seen as causing discreteness, as opposed to the quadratic potential, but the math works that way
-
-
The infinite potential well is a way to capitalize on how many people can play an instrument that vibrates a string.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @JasonHise64, @vi_ne_te ja
If you can build concepts on infinite potential wells I will build my own on NaNs
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.