People who talk about the inscrutability of neural networks are often complaining about the lack of mathematical proofs for optimality, convergence etc. If you bring them, it doesn't mean they will suddenly become scrutable :) any more than to 0.00000001% of mathematicians..
-
-
-
No, that’s not what regulators and politicians are talking about. They want human justifiability of algorithmic decisions, not convergence proofs or guarantees. That’s a sideshow of minority math-supremacists within tech that is largely unimportant right now
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
GEB is 1000 pages of this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Decision trees, linear models are easily interpretable. This gives a breakdown for different algorithms https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DTuzYroVAAAa1Rs.jpg:large …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
generalized linear models are not self-explanatory but are highly scrutable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Incel behavior qualifies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Decision trees
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.