When attention is very scarce, and you have some discretionary ability to boost signals, any act of public curiosity becomes a political act. Whatever the content of your opinion on X, simply being publicly curious about X (minimum=liking a tweet) sends a message.
-
Show this thread
-
I suspect one reason
@robinhanson drew fire for broaching sex redistribution is simply because as a signal booster he diverted scarce public attention to that topic. The actual opinion matters less than the act of putting that topic in the public short-term magic 7±2 meme buffer3 replies 2 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr @robinhanson
I don’t think that’s it. Mostly I think there’s an obviously heinous misreading, and given the cause with relation to which he brought it up, many people read his lack of clear disavowal as a wink and nudge endorsement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yeah a lot of people reacted on that, but I also saw a lot of meta anger for boosting the topic at all, a “don’t feed the incels” thing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.