The longer a live twitter thread, the more likely it is to be crackpottery (not counting listicle threads).
I haven’t done live ones longer than ~30 I think. Newsletters have gone to ~100 but that’s just numbered essay paragraphs, with lots of editing/rearranging/resequencing.
Conversation
The irreversibility of live tweet threading means the person is improvising the argument. This is rarely robust >30 points unless it is an argument they’ve made a LOT in the past.
The one exception is conspiratorial thinking. Unlike logic, red string is sequence agnostic.
2
9
While some people do pre-compose threads and fake live-tweet them, you can usually tell: it lacks the freshness of raw improv.
True live tweetstorming >30 reveals either total mastery of the topic or total crackpottery
Replying to
Exploratory threads might be an exception. You can easily mine rich insight veins for more than 30 tweets if you don't need a coherent structure.
If only Twitter had a better UI for viewing branching threads. Then you could use subthreads to separate lines of attack... 🤔
1
1
Replying to
Some smart friends who have worked on this stuff have convinced me that branching UIs are almost never the answer. If you think you need branching, you typically need something else.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
I aimed for Kintsugi - gilded cracked pottery of a master craftsman. But I mostly I just had large chunks of broken thoughts glued randomly together with bits of poop metaphor
1
1
5



