Conversation

Replying to and
I see where you're going with mediocre now. You're right, I was using it wrong. If I end up writing that, I'll choose other terms. Your "mediocre" comes close to the SubGenius concept of Slack, as a natural pattern resisting paperclip maximization. +1, would get rejected again!
1
2
This isn't the first time you've saved me the job of writing something by doing it better than I could. Getting this pearl for the price of the rejection of a mediocre pitch is more than I could have asked for. Thank you, sincerely.
1
2