Not even kidding. What is common to genius and low-skill domains is that they tend to be bounded. Genius domains just have more richness for intuition to work on Mediocre intelligences tend to deal with the open, tedious messy domains where neither genius, nor stupidity work
-
-
Show this thread
-
The straight-up arms race scenario of trying to be “smarter” than machines always seemed strategically wrong. John Henry wrong. This “dealing with open systems” is a kind of intelligence but an oblique kind. One that projects to mediocrity on regular intelligence vector.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What’s lacking here is clarity around the goal of the functioning. What if AI and robots take over all STEM and distribution, leaving humans to Fuller-ize and go back to what they were doing before they were told they needed to get a job: art, storytelling, music, philosophy?
-
Do you think capitalism can survive robots taking over, or is there a breaking point into some inevitable trajectory of fully automated luxury space communism or similar? Wouldn’t peak AI/robotics make the current economy obsolete, with attendant sociocultural consequences?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If intelligence could be traded like derivatives ;) AAA intelligence. Sub-prime intelligence. Junk intelligence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"B Ark: not worth the cycles"
-
Precisely. People forget the biggest B Ark lesson: they’re the ones who survive and thrive
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wrote about this recently. I’m a big fan of mediocrity across a wide range of domains. It’s much more useful than excellence in one.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.