Conversation

Inequality is interesting. It’s like we just got bored of the topic and moved on without reaching any conclusions. Remember Piketty? He was popular circa 2 BW.* Came up with that mystic r>g formula that everyone promptly forgot. Also #Occupy * BW=Before Weirding. 2016 AD=1 AW
9
41
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
You can obviously reshape the degree from high to low. Governments do it routinely. It’s the basic idea of all taxation Nobody is shooting for zero inequality except some extreme communists so that’s a straw man
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
Meh you’re caricaturing Societies are fully capable of distinguishing levels between 0 and 100 gini with different narratives Quantification is not fundamental, innumeracy is irrelevant. It’s like claiming you can’t distinguish Everest from a small hill without height measures