My differences with you are mainly re: whether things are good/bad (ie valuative diffs)
My differences with Nils are mainly re: how mechanisms work (ie how good/bad choice expansions and constrictions work).
Am working on a post on the latter. Content to let former be.
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I’m an ideological boggart, so not WYSIWYG. When talking to statist liberals like Nils, I tend to play libertarian asshole. When talking to cryptofascist rightists, I larp SJW. When talking to SJWs, I larp freeze peacher.
You, I can’t read, which you can take as a compliment
5
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
There you go. Harambe was just the first of many self-immanatized eschatons to come. Each creating a heaven-on-earth comprising bunnyholes for suitable bunnies.
There is no red pill, only 50 shades of blue. Alice is always in some wonderland. Q is, can she talk to Bob in his?
2
2
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
build AND bill
In-app purchase for google translate.
2
Google Translate for incommensurate epistemic frameworks? Good luck with that!
2
1
The default fallback translation will be “fight fight fight”
Agreed on the prognosis.
But to return to normative questions: I’m not sure that such a Hobbesian epistemic order is better than a (relatively benign) hegemonic reality.
In other words, yes, it’s better than Juche. But is it better than, say, Sweden in 1960?
1

