Fine then, my diff with you is probably that I think people are engaging with it just fine. Even if they get uppity with professors who know better as a result and don't always read a conflict right. ie they're drinking responsibly most of the time.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
The "rampant crazy alcoholism" is happening via other sources like say infowars or anti-vaxx facebook groups, not wikipedia (which is what I'm specifically defending).
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The one thing I'd agree with you on is that the wikipedia model is not in fact generalizable at all. It remains the n=1 sample proof point of too many arguments.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think the future is knowledge being embedded in context-aware information toolchains. Tvtropes points to the future better than wikipedia, though it captures a not-quite-functional knowledge.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
I'm all for that kind of polycentric-narrative post-canonicity local truth ground world. I'd rather be an eager, great citizen of tvtropes than a reluctant, coerced one of the local town hall overrun by NIMBYs.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.