And btw, you’re Elkusing the thread again!
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Simple test: do you *really* think the world would be a better informed place in a broad sense if Wikipedia were shut down by law today? If yes then I walk away from this thread jaw open and doubting your sanity.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Fine then, my diff with you is probably that I think people are engaging with it just fine. Even if they get uppity with professors who know better as a result and don't always read a conflict right. ie they're drinking responsibly most of the time.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The "rampant crazy alcoholism" is happening via other sources like say infowars or anti-vaxx facebook groups, not wikipedia (which is what I'm specifically defending).
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
*shrug* you're looking for corner-case perfection. These are not problems you solve. These are problems you manage down to 'good enough for now' level until the next thing comes along. Wikimedia model is a good enough pragmatic standard for me for 2018 when median is far worse
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.