Invisible hand: the game is ‘means of production’ People: internetz! we own means of production now, yay IH: TOS update:new game is ‘distribution’; aggregate or die People: blockchain sauce! we now own our distribution, yay IH: TOS update: new game is ‘UX’ To be continued
-
-
Replying to @vgr
owning "means of production" is one element of a different mindset, a different way to think about time, value and trading. Is that the key?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @andreisavu
No, the entire premise that owning means of production is key is flawed. Darwinian economic competition has no fixed locus. Advantage accrues to whoever controls the bottleneck scarce resource, and there always exists such a bottleneck. There is no arrival into “postcapitalism”
4 replies 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @vgr @andreisavu
Is "liquidity + high risk preference" a scarce resource in this / your view? The answer to that defines the point of agreement I'd like to extract out of "anticapitalist"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. It defines meaning-makers. The Insufficient Supply of Elon Musks problem, fueling emergence of personality cult capitalism (a good thing imo)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.