Invisible hand: the game is ‘means of production’ People: internetz! we own means of production now, yay IH: TOS update:new game is ‘distribution’; aggregate or die People: blockchain sauce! we now own our distribution, yay IH: TOS update: new game is ‘UX’ To be continued
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Control is, as always, in the hands of the distinct entity closest to the user.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hyperfekt
Not necessarily. In bitcoin, it’s whoever is closest to cheap power. In EVs, it’s whoever owns the cobalt and lithium mines. There’s no fixed locus is my point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
I think I see what you're trying to say, but I don't see how that is a meaningful notion. The advantage exists only in comparison to a different pattern of supply/demand. Viewed in temporal isolation, this in-market power is either not a real thing or prices have not yet adjusted
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hyperfekt @vgr
(Hope you understand what I'm trying to get at, having some trouble finding clear & specific wording given that these are rather soft notions I don't necessarily have the vocabulary present for.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not quite getting the objection but this is already too abstract I guess so best to let it rest 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.