16/ What would make me get serious is if I could figure out a good model, with many teachers, of Ribbonfarm School as a Weird Topics grad school. I have no interest in the undergrad-equivalent stuff (though I need that to exist) or things that univs do well already at grad level
-
Show this thread
-
17/ Btw if any of you are interested in this stuff and looking to “disrupt” regular grad school or even undergrad, note that that’s likely a bad idea. They’re disrupting themselves pretty well with their free/cheap catalog-openings in partnership with the Courseras of the world
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
18/ What we’re talking about here is really an indie teaching scene by analogy to indie music. The big univs are like the big record labels. No point competing where they have a deep back catalog of material ready to go. Either teach New Economy UG or Weird Topics grad school
2 replies 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread -
19/ If you want to teach New Economy UG, you have to think like a consumer business and design for scale, efficiency, packaging, mass marketing, intake funnels, and probably a sub $300 price range
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
20/ If you want to teach Weird Topics grad school, you need to figure out a link/cross-subsidy with research/writing/making/indie-creating, focus on bespoke teaching relationships, and a price < $100, unless you can figure out a scholarship model and make it free (my preference)
3 replies 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @vgr
I have similar ideas for “weird topics” in productivity taught by many different teachers. But why don’t you think it can be premium priced? Like boutique in-person courses on massage therapy, orgasmic meditation, public speaking, sitting/walking techniques
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fortelabs @vgr
Such courses consume a significant part of Bay Area time and budgets
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fortelabs
Same reason nobody who deserves a PhD ever pays for one. Adverse selection. The point of such teaching is to surface best talent who can advance research/writing, not people who can most afford to pay. They’re not entirely orthogonal, but definitely not the same populations.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr @fortelabs
You could do premium pricing but probably not for the most research-interest frontier topics. The examples you offered are more a sort of luxury lifestyle consumption product than what I’m talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vgr @fortelabs
Many actual research-frontier PhDs are well-modeled as “luxury lifestyle consumption products” where people spend via opportunity cost, fwiw.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
True, but I try not to judge institutions at their most off-mission. When university research actually works it works really well. Also, appearances are deceptive. Really high stress and depression rates on the free rider side of PhDs. The ones doing serious work are happier.
-
-
Replying to @vgr @fortelabs
All are true. Think of it like an ascetic monastic order. On-mission for the church. It gets prayers, research. A lifestyle consumption good for people qualified for but uninterested in trade and worldly affairs. High stress & depression, b/c it’s still unhealthy.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.