This is excellent. I got both wrong answers (19, 26) before getting the right one. Lovely abstraction leaks.
Conversation
Show replies
Show replies
Replying to
It took me way too long to see the multiplication sign. I first got 26, then wised up a little and got 19, then noticed the * and got 38.
3
3
Show replies
Replying to
Two answers
a) If the number of sides of polygons are to be considered, then,
2+3+(3x11) = 38
b) If the number of polygons to be considered (irrespective of number of sides), then,
2+3+(3X10) = 35
1
1
Replying to
I think 38 is objectively preferable since it explains more of the data. If you start ignoring details many answers become acceptable.
1
1
5
Show replies




