Has a behavior regime structurally similar to cancer been found in any non-living complex system?
Or is it purely rhetorical/metaphoric, as in "growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell" (environmentalist Edward Abbey)
Conversation
Replying to
self-brainstorm: virus are non-living and exhibit "growth for growth sake." I think certain kinds of algae will strangle off pond ecosystems by covering the surface (I'm unclear if 'ecosystem' qualifies as a living system?).
1
2
invasive species often exhibit extreme growth to the detriment (and potential collapse) of pre-existing ecosystems.
1
its a stretch but maybe the abelian sandpile model. Represent a human with each cell as a grain of sand in 'energy space' (land of potential wells, etc). We start off as one cell, and then multiply with little changes to each.
1
Each new cell/multiplication is like another particle of sand dropping onto the collective pile that is "us" [..in energy space]. Once the pile gets high enough, it reaches critical state.
1
From this point forward, each new sand particle added could either have no effect or cause a total system collapse--just as the human body is relatively able to fight cancer while growing until one eventually "slips through the cracks" leading to systemic collapse.
1
[let me know if any of these seem close or if i'm totally off base, wasn't sure I fully understood the question]
1
Replying to
is the basic idea that something in a non-living complex system is spawned that resource-hogs all the other system components? [black hole jumps to mind, but still feels off]
2
Replying to
I don’t know but I think it’s something like a network effect startup disrupting the body or something
Replying to
in a primordial pool of amino acids, I might suggest the first appearance of (self replicating) RNA is just such a disruption. again feels like its verging on the living though [cancer suggests to me there must be some "death" of the system at the end]
1

