Kahneman writes in his book “The world makes less sense than you think. The coherence comes mostly from the way your mind works.” implicitly saying Sys 2 takes care of coherence (‘narrative’). What evidence is there that there is something else in play (esp. neurologically)?
-
-
-
Says 3 is really Sys 1 reused on a different time scale of chronic rather than acute stress. It’s like cognitive cholesterol build up. Paleo mechanisms operating in modern environments. Spandrels turning into features.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is there an app for sys 3
-
You're living it... doing work connected to deep time. Now just put GPS collars on your cows and get someone to build an app so you can see them on a map.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
See also this Times Higher Education review of The Enigma of Reason, which briefly mentions dual process at the end. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/review-the-enigma-of-reason-hugo-mercier-and-dan-sperber-allen-lane#survey-answer …
-
I hear you, but I think such criticisms are misguided. They bring physics-theory type criticism to what is essentially a more narrative type model of neuro phenomena. It's not the *type* of theory that can be "debunked."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i think it has 0.
-
There you are wrong. Plenty of solid neuroscience emerging that reveal a good deal of deep, evolved structure to the brain that maps to decision-making modes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
did you just rename collective unconscious?
-
More individual. Collective is a dimension on all 3
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.