I may be an "idea racist" so to speak. I think some memeplexes are simply better than others in survivability terms, and destined to rule other memeplexes. They may not also be more "true" though This position of course combines the worst of solipsism, relativism, and absolutism
-
-
-
-
Replying to @vgr
Have you heard Jordan Peterson discuss this on Sam Harris' pod cast?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @atthatmatt
Nope, not really my neck of the woods philosophically, and I don't listen to podcasts or videos
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
I was interested in argument regarding where we should position morality. Should it be possible for something to be amoral, or should morality be an optional factor. Peterson argued morality first, so amorality not an option, to maximize Truth, which means indefinite survival.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah, I am basically uninterested in morality so it's not a very fertile frame of thought for me My "time" response was not flippant. In the spirit of "the market can remain irraitonal longer than you can remain solvent"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.