I may be an "idea racist" so to speak. I think some memeplexes are simply better than others in survivability terms, and destined to rule other memeplexes. They may not also be more "true" though This position of course combines the worst of solipsism, relativism, and absolutism
Nope, not really my neck of the woods philosophically, and I don't listen to podcasts or videos
-
-
I was interested in argument regarding where we should position morality. Should it be possible for something to be amoral, or should morality be an optional factor. Peterson argued morality first, so amorality not an option, to maximize Truth, which means indefinite survival.
-
More or less
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.