3/ There’s also an online forum only for BASB partic, and soon a special section of that forum only for praxis members to discuss blog posts
-
Show this thread
-
4/ Purpose of that is so BASB ppl have access to praxis discussions, but not vice-versa. Also to keep specialized terminology for course limited to ppl who know it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
5/ But now we’re wondering if this is all too convoluted and dividing ppl up into narrow categories requiring active mgmt and access control
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
6/ Should we just have a single Forte Labs slack channel and single online forum, perhaps with channels/sections of each of those reserved for BASB partic, where we give them special attention?
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
7/ I’ve heard that 1k ppl is rule of thumb for critical mass for online community. Putting them together would yield group of 800. Once critical mass is reached, maybe offshoots will even be self-sustaining as well
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
8/ This might also make it easier for small groups to self-organize. Likely that niches exist across different products
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
9/ Downside is that very different kinds of conversations will be going on in one place. Some using terms that will be unintelligible to others. Or on very specific topics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
10/ What are some best practices or recommendations on how to manage this? Should we do big tent surrounded by smaller tents, or just lots of medium-sized tents?
6 replies 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread -
Replying to @fortelabs
Yeah this is overkill. Create boundaries around trust contours not theme.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Hm interesting. I guess the distortion is that there are access levels depending on how much they’ve paid. Which is very different from how engaged they are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Pricing by access level has always seemed shaky to me
-
-
Replying to @vgr
I can see its limitations. Access level is better “priced” by time/attention spent, not money spent
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fortelabs
It’s just not worth managing at low unit economics is my takeaway from similar issues at Q lab.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.