In the OODA loop, you don’t usually get paid for the observe and orient work. So if you’re in OO-dominant mode for too long you’ll run out of money unless you have a lot of capital. Conversely hand-to-mouth existence is all DA, no OO. Capital (=PE) levels predict OO-dominance.
-
-
Replying to @vgr @jpaulreed
Going out on a limb here, but I wonder if Boyd had such usage in mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @allspaw @jpaulreed
He absolutely did. OODA theory came out of E-M theory which is all PE/KE dynamics. OODA was an attempt to deal with the fast transients paradox: better planes by E-M theory losing to worse planes. The explanation was better OO=faster transients.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr @jpaulreed
He had what parts of his model one got paid for?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @allspaw @jpaulreed
By analogy to energy yes.
2:17 PM - 17 Mar 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.