Conversation

Replying to and
Could you post some specific claims? Panksepp shows how there are core, "primitive" emotional responses and behaviors that are shared. He does not argue against more complex emotions or emotional regulation being more constructivist
2
Ok I read first 5%. This is more pop neuro than Panksepp so maybe unfair to compare. I don't see much contradiction. Simplification, yes. Also perhaps attacking a strawman of classic neuro. Or perhaps Panksepp is not classic neuro. Eg he would not consider Happy or Angry as core
Image
4
Replying to and
I did and its not a valid criticism of Panksepp, afaict. See my other reply. But I don't disagree with your latter claim -- the majority of our affective experience is colored by much more complex responses than the few shared fundamental ones
1
Show replies