I mean the main point is that the right opposites are statist-v-anarchist and capital-v-labor. In one quadrant you have “true” liberarians, then “left” anarchists, then Maoists/Stalinists, then Dengists/LKYists.
-
-
Replying to @nils_gilman @Aelkus
The vast majority of people who call themselves libertarians will take LKYism over left anarchism every day and twice on Sundays—which goes to show that their real commitment is not to anti-statism but to capital
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nils_gilman @Aelkus
The snarky version of this to ask the following rhetorical question: have you ever met a self-described libertarian who doesn’t live in a nice neighborhood?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @nils_gilman @Aelkus
The dirty truth is that most self-described libertarians are nothing more than casuistrists for unfettered capital. And when you read all the primary material around MPS, this becomes entirely apparent.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Mont Pelerin Society — the fons et origo of the modern libertarian movement
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @nils_gilman @Aelkus
now I have to look up fons et origo you intellectual elitists and your jargon, why can't you say everything with memes and rick and morty refs like the rest of us
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Singapore is a weirdly unlikely NRx fetish state too...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You are easily the #1 memester in my feed :)
-
-
It’s the pot calling the kettle Harambe
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -

0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.