The Naloxone debate makes me think: there is meta-moral hazard of some sort to entertaining policy proposals founded on an assumption of irredeemable corruption/worst self in a broad population. Good policies leave optionality for best selves to emerge even if probability is low.
-
-
irredeemable corruption
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.