Yeah true, but as with all things Bayesian it seems to miss the point by letting the universe of discourse be effectively unbounded
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 6 more replies
-
-
-
This is the intellectual basis to Rumsfeld’s “unknown unknowns” - there’s no evidence for x but our paranoia dictates that we must act as if x is possible, maybe even likely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you're trying to make a logic argument out of a semantic argument. When that phrase was coined, "evidence" was taken to mean "direct evidence", which is different from indirect evidence (what a thermodynamic signature may produce, e.g.).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.