The growing conspiracist fringe (comprising subcultures that organize around one or more core crackpot beliefs) is not a solvable problem.
I propose calling them lottery worlds. Key governance problem is socializing outcomes when one occasionally turns out to be right.
Conversation
More to the point, you need to explain how what you call a "crackpot belief" can "turn out to be right." Does "crackpot" mean "irrational," or "unscientific," or "as yet unproven / untested"?
1
Replying to
Not solvable absent some catalyzing event of sufficient magnitude to change the trajectory. The peril of this path must be clearer to more than just a few in order to motivate change. Must go from esoteric to obvious.


