“Bump stock” is angels-on-pinhead level of gun debate.
There’s nowhere productive to go once you’re arguing that kind of detail. No big debate ever got resolved once it hit arguments that level.
Oh well 3d printing will at least end this stage of the debate if not the killing.
Conversation
Replying to
I love that comparison. But on second thought, isn‘t it exactly this kind of argument (in the angels case it was provoked for this purpose - here it is a coincidental fruit of reality) which, due to its „ad absurdum“ nature, kicks discourse out of equilibrium, forces a reckoning?
1

