I love that comparison. But on second thought, isn‘t it exactly this kind of argument (in the angels case it was provoked for this purpose - here it is a coincidental fruit of reality) which, due to its „ad absurdum“ nature, kicks discourse out of equilibrium, forces a reckoning?
-
-
-
Often violent though
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the assumption was that it was going to be a soft target to go after with regulations, so that politicians could be seen to be responsive.
-
That’s what I mean. It helps the optics at best. Doesn’t actually do much to the killing sprees. An actual response would be better than a theater
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.