There's a dozen people I'd like to get to know better, hang out with, have deeper chats with, collaborate with over many years. No 2 of them live in the same city. No 3 in the same country. No 4 on the same continent. The Internet is like a piquant whiff of an impossible life.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
In your twitter bio it should be RTs and not RT’s. You are welcome.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sajithpai
Stylistic judgment call. Acronyms can take an apostrophe for plural forms to avoid confusion about whether the s. I tend to go with apostrophes. https://brians.wsu.edu/2016/05/16/acronyms-and-apostrophes/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Prof Paul Brians' argument is that it is "now so universal as to be acceptable in almost any context." is understood. Your argument is different - "avoid confusion about whether the s" That i did not get.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sajithpai
I mean it's one of the ways I decide which convention to use in a particular case. Seems to be a rule undergoing evolutionhttps://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55970/plurals-of-acronyms-letters-numbers-use-an-apostrophe-or-not …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Thanks for this. Oxford Dictionaries, Webster's Collegiate, NYT, AP, Chicago Manual of Style and US Govt Printing Office and all say RTs. Only Practical English Usage (Swan) recommends RT's. But ya, we should stop here. I guess it is a matter of style.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sajithpai
Sigh, I guess it’s time to change my old fashioned ways
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I’m not too old to change with the times 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
