8\ These examples are not pathologies. They are fundamental problems of interstellar commerce. I read a lot of sci-fi but I don't know of many authors who write about interstellar distributed consensus. Everyone writes about the engines, but the money is just as vital...
-
Show this thread
-
9\ I'm writing about these problems not just because they're fun but because I think they motivate clearer thinking about distributed systems here on Earth, today. Also, I simply don't know the solutions! How would you solve these problems, if you were a future financier?
2 replies 4 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
10\ I think that "long integration times" must be part of the solution: a 20-year "pending transaction period" for a bank or a 20-year target block time for a blockchain. Combine that with still "waiting for 6 confirmations" and you get century-long transaction timescales.
#whoa2 replies 2 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
11\ Such a system could never be used for day-to-day transactions (space-coffees). Something else would be necessary. Banks might let you borrow against your holdings in another star system until they can be transferred locally (and your opportunity to double-spend eliminated).
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
12\ For blockchains, this problem could not be solved with bigger/faster blocks -- the only way to deal with the uncertainty caused by light lag is to wait. Lesson: Different chains do different things. Layers (
#LightningNetwork) and sidechains are necessary for space-coffees.1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
13\ Hashpower ratios between star systems are also critical. If hashpower on Earth is many times that of α-Centauri, newly mined blocks on α-Centauri will constantly get uncled. Users on α-Centauri will only trust Earth blocks. Mining will become centralized to Earth: colonialism
3 replies 3 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
14\ Today's analogy for light-lag is low-bandwidth: both limit your ability to mine and thus cause centralization. Some ignore this issue, but it's real. Lesson: Increasing block sizes with constant network connectivity speeds disadvantages miners with low-bandwidth (~light-lag)
1 reply 3 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
15\ In summary, pondering these absurd scenarios may help you understand constraints on consensus inherent to the physical universe. Analogies for these constraints can help us design better distributed systems today. Also, don't tell me blockchains have no real use case :)
3 replies 4 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
\16 ADDENDA:
@vgr Provided two great links with more on this subject: First is a wonderful article which addresses the issues I raised above in much more depth from@jasonmorton. I especially like the part about interstellar advertising :)https://medium.com/@jasonmorton/relativistic-finance-a38f98262a49 …2 replies 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
Oh hey Jason didn't know you were on twitter or would have tagged you
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.