Nice to find some company in my anti-Davos stance. Rare in our....uh, layer of the literary-industrial complex pyramid
It throws off a vibe that really turns me off
-
-
Replying to @vgr
To paraphrase Huxley, “I'm really awfully glad I'm a Premium Mediocre, because I don't work so hard. The Plutocratic Insurgents work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever.”
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @nils_gilman @vgr
I think you’re too hard on Davos as not the place decisions are made. At times it is where ideas are seeded, where official futures grow. That influences later choices. I challenge you to show me actually existing globalization would have been the same as it is without Davos
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @micostigan @nils_gilman
Venkatesh Rao Retweeted Venkatesh Rao
Oh, it’s influential alright, just not on what I consider the right side of history.https://twitter.com/vgr/status/957414171699642368 …
Venkatesh Rao added,
Venkatesh Rao @vgrMy main mental model for Davos now is the Council of Trent. The analogue to Luther nailing 95 theses to a church door is not the WSF, but Barlow composing his Declaration of Independence for cyberspace while attending Davos in 1996. https://www.wired.com/2016/02/its-been-20-years-since-this-man-declared-cyberspace-independence/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr @micostigan
I’m not even sure Davos is that influential. The burden of proof surely lies on that side of the register: name one event or episode or process or whatnot that would have happened differently without Davos. You can maybe point to a few trade deals and commercial transactions. 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nils_gilman @micostigan
The fact that Trump still wanted to be seen there after years of being snubbed suggests you’re right. It’s more the red carpet than the studio. It has as much relationship to important things happening as the Oscars do to good movies being made. Consequence, not cause.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @vgr @nils_gilman
I think you’re thinking of influence in terms of realized consequences, whereas Hirschman would point to intended but unrealized consequences. In
@wef I would say competitiveness is an interesting case study. It’s work had consequences...and not just cos I was a small part of itpic.twitter.com/vdhCdWWX3U
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @micostigan @vgr and
This is interesting https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/01/26/facebook-and-google-are-doomed-george-soros-says/?utm_term=.b1c941bd577d …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micostigan @vgr and
“The internet monopolies have neither the will nor the inclination to protect society against the consequences of their actions. That turns them into a menace and it falls to the regulatory authorities to protect society against them,” 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @micostigan @vgr and
He said Davos was a good place to announce: “Their days are numbered.” https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jan/25/george-soros-facebook-and-google-are-a-menace-to-society … 2/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I think Soros is basically too old, so Clarke’s first law applies. I think “regulation” in the conventional sense is a not-even-wrong mental model for check-and-balance of tech power. It’s like expecting a land-based feudal nobility to regulate city-based industry.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.