It’s really not news if its just a rerun with no new message to the movement, I don’t blame them. It’s not seeking sensationalism so much as a bare reason to cover. If bickering over a cap symbol can swamp any larger message that might have been there, not a good sign
For example, “equal rights” doesn’t work because it actually is not big enough. It contemplates a small change within the patriarchy. The very idea of “rights” would need to be refactored in a feminist way. What would “rights” mean if women ran the world?
-
-
I see. I don't subscribe to this idea that a huge intellectual proof of concept has to be presented "for and by women" for any change to be made. I'll take reproductive rights and equal pay right now, thanks.
-
On the other end of the spectrum, Begum Rokhaya wasn't so far off the mark more than a century ago. (My point being, a lot of such thinking has been done and then ignored for being too radical). http://digital.library.upenn.edu/women/sultana/dream/dream.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
