Conversation

Replying to and
Your cause/effect pairing is off, it is possible that 100% driven by X could lead to A, B, C, D, etc... but there is no reason to say that it would lead to H and only H. This is a logical fallacy. I recommend a classical Philosophy Logic course such as one from .
I don't care if the account is a human being, a male, a female, a Pokemon... If they post silly logical fallacies, then I'll say so. I won't not call out someone because of some identifiable mark.. that would be biased.