Surprisingly cogent meditation on probabilistic thinking in the NYT. Takeaways: 1. People round probabilities up to 100% or down to 0%. 2. People call probability “wrong” if <50% events happen 3. People need a story to take <50% scenarios seriouslyhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/24/opinion/2017-wrong-numbers.html …
-
-
Interesting. Their table also seems to show a higher compression towards 0 than that at 100%. I'd like to see this in a similar graphic. Maybe when I get back from the beach
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.