Surprisingly cogent meditation on probabilistic thinking in the NYT.
Takeaways:
1. People round probabilities up to 100% or down to 0%.
2. People call probability “wrong” if <50% events happen
3. People need a story to take <50% scenarios seriously
Conversation
Replying to
This from prospect theory (Kahneman and tversky) gives a nice view of how humans perceive probabilities. Its why people play the lottery and are afraid of airplane travel.
1
17
55
Since this was far and away my most popular tweet, here is some more - quantitative assessments of qualitative probabilities. I was surprised by the spread. Note also local maxima near 0 and 1 present in most
2
10
21
Replying to
I recall an old paper that talked about probability perception language if I can find it... from like the 60s

