what if these conversations are more ??!! at the treatment of X like it's doing something entirely new
-
-
-
They never are. It’s almost always “put the young whippersnappers in their place, how dare they disrespect hallowed traditions and fail to pay obseisance to this vaguely related thing?”
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve lived through a similar number. I’ve found that Xes which can adequately answer that question succeed and survive and Xes which don’t, don’t. It’s the definition of success. Plenty of highly visible tech failed to answer the question and quietly died.
-
For example, do you remember “Complex Event Processing”? Probably not.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The real issue is Z, the pool from which X is drawn. Z is a mixed bag that produces not only X (seeds), but also X' (weeds). So a clash between X and Y may not only help, but be necessary to sift the weeds out from the seeds.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can't get over how much it seems like a waste of time and energy to "oppose" blockchains. It's almost worse than the waste from PoW.
-
(PoW which by the way is approaching the energy use of televisions in the United States)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In 2009 - “my iPhone can do anything the iPad does” They never understood the delta
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
+1. And often the emergent phenomena from X end up being substitutional replacements for Y after all, but with counterintuitive beginnings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who would have thought those metal thingies to replace a decent horse anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.