If you're only useful to the useless, are you useful?
If you provide essential services to non-essential people, are they essential services? How about non-essential services to essential people?
If you need to feel needed to value yourself, can others intrinsically value you?
Conversation
Replying to
Mother Teresa : essential > non-essential
Churchill's typist: non-essential ? essential?
realize blunt nature of this portrayal is unfair but is this correct comp?
Churchill's typist played some key role to him while
Mother Teresa served as a key symbol to others.
2
Replying to
Can you be only useful to the useless? Are there uses useless people need that useful people don't? Wouldn't you just be useful in general?
1
Replying to
terms like ‘useful’ and ‘useless’ have an implied context. If you are useful to the ‘useless’, then in the context of the ‘useless’ you are useful. But then your question implies a unspecified, to be chosen by the reader, change in context.
Replying to
if I need to feel needed to value myself, and I don’t, someone else can still value me... but I won’t believe them
Replying to
"If you're only useful to the useless, are you useful?"
Yes. In fact, that's the only way to be useful. If you're only useful for other useful people, that's a vicious circle.








