Possibly scientific debates, but might be more like next generation discarding one of the views. Which is similar to winning because the other side diez.
I don't buy that burden of proof heuristic. It's on the side making the tighter claim. I've provided a few but I see no clear examples of yours yet. Climate change might be one soon, where skeptics are won over by accumulating evidence
-
-
You don't buy the idea that broad assertions should come with proof? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Regarding examples, I think you're mistaking absence of negatives from my side as presence of positive from yours. PS On climate change, here's hoping, aye!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. If I squint all examples appear to fit my model at least approximately.
Marital disagreements are a good clear example. Most are resolved by one spouse deciding to accept without conceding. 'This too shall pass'