The more rational you are naturally, the more you need tech leverage to have an impact.
The more non-rational (alt coherent cognition style, not deficiency of rationality), greater the potential return to working through people.
STEM is best bet for rationalists for a reason
Conversation
Replying to
Causality may also go the other direction - those into computers may be more lured to gamify their life, ergo have to get good at "rationality" (the limited subset needed for gamifuckation)
1
Replying to
Doubt it. The naturally endowed blow the "get good at rationality" out of the water. I'm a mediocre rationalist at best, but even I am surprised by how poor the untalented true believers are.
1
Replying to
Well that is a wild puzzle. Tech seems to be the highest impact device ATM. So - non-rational folks all need to go into elected government or podcasting? ;-)
1
Show replies
Show replies
Replying to
How to pen the subtle pun.
"...best bet for rationalists for a reason"
1
2
Replying to
why i resist diversion from programming machine into programming humans with every tactics i can muster
Replying to
Interestingly put. I agree. I've always loved STEM but never bothered to push myself in it because I've seen the personality types that do best in it, and I know that's not me. I'd get overtaken by the more methodical and systematic folks.
Yo ho ho it's a shaman's life for me
1
5
Replying to
Is STEM also more vulnerable to nonrational games because of lower nonrational intelligence?






