Conversation

Replying to and
I was tempted to write an analysis of his GSB Touchy-Feely experience in terms of your sociopaths/clueless/losers framework, but decided that explaining what was actually going on would get too many people too upset.
2
5
Replying to and
The author is clearly smart enough to comment on sjw culture, but chose not to, so it made me suspect he was playing up the naive-foreigner act a little too much for effect, like Poirot does in his mysteries. Still, it was funny :)
2
7
Replying to and
I doubt though that people at Goldman wouldn't recognize the symmetry between win-for-wrong-reasons/lose-for-right-reasons. Even average poker player tells me that. I'd guess that angle is either fiction, or he misread a don't-talk-about-it norm for obliviousness.
Replying to and
Yes, that struck me as dubious too. Although I can imagine a scenario in which management at Goldman might not understand the basics of what traders do, and are promoted for being effective salesmen instead
1