Labor is interestingly fungible even when the activities are varied. I think a profession emerges when work makes you as much as you make work. That generally means second-order tool-making I think. Shaping other humans is one kind. Making tools to make tools is another.
Conversation
Replying to
the way I think about it is in proto-communities, everybody has more or less the same methodological knowledge, and there isn't any cleavage until the group gets sufficiently large
1
2
my bet is on shaman because that's really the first instance of somebody with at least ostensible special knowledge/access.
1
4
like "who is the one person who gets to skip out completely on the hunting/gathering tasks?"
2
3
Replying to
That's an interesting conjecture. may know the actual answer. I can think of the counter case of shamanic knowledge being a sort of distributed knowledge base of "magical rumors" so to speak. Much like meme-making today isn't quite a profession.
3
3
I’ve seen cases for trapping, mining/mineral exploitation, crafts, social influencing, religion/healing of course...
1
5
as far as “totally excused from other responsibilities” - combo of mineral exploitation/monopolizing & crafts makes sense
2
5
Sarah: so no fully cleaved off roles until early states?
The way I always heard it is basically what Dorian said: that the first specialized role in forager-type societies was shaman. I figured that would also be the first to cleave into its own profession.
2
2
no I think mineral exploitation massively predates earliest states - long-distance trade certainly does
1
8
basically specialization in making proto-money makes sense to me, a step from protein specialization
1
6
What is protein specialization? Do you mean hunting in hoe cultures?
no specializing in some particular animal and trading with nearby others when it’s not that season
1
2



