Empirically, 795 million suffer from hunger, 200-300 million live in zones of chronic conflict. The rest is just rounding error. Allowing for overlap guesstimate 1 billion, or 1/7 people.
-
-
-
So 6/7 living normal or peaceful life.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
some starts here: https://phys.org/news/2016-04-extreme-weather-armed-conflicts-million.html … def >250 mil.pic.twitter.com/Sun5RSyr63
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suspect about 80%, unless China or India is hiding a massive famine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess those definitions might be biased and oversimplified.It's ultimately an internal mind game. What you might "objectively" classify as disasters might have a different effect on people. E.g. someone hungry in a slum vs a "rich" American shooting himself because of his job
-
Sometimes the disasters are more or less well hidden.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"cute stress conditions like wars, famines, floods, disasters, revolutions etc" check your privilege, I'm trying to get a degree while not believing in degrees and while registering for too many courses here, I'd rather be in a warzone
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For some intervals of "any given time" and some values of "dealing with", I might argue for 99+%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
