I have this weird theory that white supremacy hasn't ever been a proper governing ideology. More like a folk theory of implications of other ideologies like mercantilism or fascism which have actually governed. As in, "if the strong should rule the weak, whites should be on top"
Evolutionary psych has same problem. There's like 8 explanations for how humans developed a brain-size advantage over competing similar size mammals (see recent Dunbar paper)
-
-
I am hedging towards a universalism in my thinking, but I don't know what it would look like. I think PoA cannot sustain; not so much the dominant emerges as the plurality blows up. This theme is all over Dostoevsky's writing.
-
I don't think a single universalism has ever been powerful and closed enough to test that way. People always overstate totalitarian power.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.