Theory If a military conflict lasts longer than 3 yrs, economic strength determines outcome. If an economic conflict lasts longer than 30 yrs, ideological superiority determines outcome. If an ideological conflict lasts >300 yrs, technological generativity determines outcome
-
-
Replying to @vgr
you’re not allowed to view ideologies hierarchically without reproducing white supremacy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adamhump
I have this weird theory that white supremacy hasn't ever been a proper governing ideology. More like a folk theory of implications of other ideologies like mercantilism or fascism which have actually governed. As in, "if the strong should rule the weak, whites should be on top"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
what I’m trying to say is from a respectful, liberal relativist point of view, we can’t have hierarchy in ideologies because what group gets to determine hierarchy? where is the higher truth to appeal to if we admit cultural relativist hypothesis?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
as you can see I’m very woke
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adamhump
Beware, you're starting to get lost in a kind of boring hyper-meta performance art like South Park sarcastaball. I'm basically assuming a Hegelian dialectical framework of ideological creative destruction to speculate here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
responding to “plurality of absolutes” (which I think is damaging) and not being sarcastic so much as Socratic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adamhump
Newer plurality can replace an older, smaller one. Mass extinctions = dinosaur plurality getting replaced by mammal plurality for eg. Punctuated equilibrium theory of ideological evolution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
stratification / heirarchy of ideology implies a universal metric to guage competing ideologies. plurality of absolutes means "we can and must live within disagreements over what is true". can we believe in both the latter and the former? is plurality it's own universalism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adamhump
No you're confusing evolutionary success with hierarchical ranking. Ascent-of-man fallacy. Mammals just out survived dinos
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I used "superiority" in actual evolutionary outcome sense, not human valuations.
-
-
Replying to @vgr
what if I thought the theory of evolution was white devil sophistry? what if I argued (as many in our society would) that "science" is fundamentally a "human valuation" and latently, an "instrument of oppression"?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.