We're entering Vietnam of gender wars. Men will continue losing while biological-determinism ideology limits our ability to reimagine relationships with women in win-win ways that cedes *relative* political agency to bank absolute gains for all, without seeing it as emasculation.
Conversation
I'm out of energy but I'll close on this one. It's interesting that you don't even question why 2 of those choices are explicitly "work for men". If top leaders were as likely to be women this would be a complete non-question. Ergo still a need for feminism.
