The function of a narrative is to control your surprisability. If you're always surprised or never surprised, you have a broken narrative
-
Show this thread
-
From a decision-making perspective, a good personal narrative is one that leaves you surprised by 1-2 out of every 5 unpredicted events
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
"Good" enlightenment allows you to tune the "surprisability" of your narrative. "Bad" enlightenment breaks control over surprisability
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
People who claim "enlightenment" (and sincerely convinced of it based on inner experiences) are often indistinguishable from clueless, why?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Greater verbal precision = picking right word better than others. Emotional sensitivity = picking what to feel more precisely than others
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
This is a trainable. Most people think caring/not-caring is something they have no control over. Just a behavioral precondition. Not true.
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
By learning how to care at increasingly fine-grained levels, you can control your surprisability at increasingly fine-grained levels.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread
Most people think in passive broad strokes about caring, "I care about tech, I don't care about sports." Pattern of care directs attention
-
-
To get to control over caring, attention needs to come ahead of caring and direct it. Care/don't care decisions go lower and lower.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.