There are no psychological facts in the sense of conclusions of the science of psychology that we are justified in believing to be true
Conversation
Replying to
How about more object level stuff like subliminal priming effects? Or existence of color blindness? Or things Oliver Sacks saw?
1
1
Replying to
priming is mostly fake, oliver sacks is <3 <3 but I’m suspicious of everything he wrote, color blindness likely real
1
1
oh unless you just mean linguistic priming stuff, that seems solid
1
1
Replying to
I think you're mostly talking about social psych rather than individual
1
1
Replying to
Plenty is known. It's just not well integrated into theories.
1
1
Replying to
yeah, all the narratively appealing and easily-communicable theories are on the spectrum of laughably to tragically wrong
1
1
Replying to
That's just the superego of your shadow's inferiority complex projecting onto the oedipus

