Counterintuitively, when things are non-interchangeable you have to do a lot more swapping
-
-
-
Replying to @theartlav
Because you would expect to interchange interchangeable things
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vgr
Huh? When they aren't, you have to swap things instead of using interchangeables in place, not vice versa.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @theartlav
Hm interesting subtlety. When you do redundancy swaps, you are either reacting to a failure that makes a part unique, or balancing out wear
2:48 PM - 17 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.